compare / notebooklm

A NotebookLM you own.

NotebookLM is a great cloud notebook. Uoink is the local, open-source alternative: it saves your videos, podcasts, and articles to your own disk and hands them to Claude, Cursor, or any MCP agent — no account, no cloud.

honest comparison

Uoink vs NotebookLM.

FeatureUoinkNotebookLM
Where it runsYour machine (local-first)Google cloud
Account requiredNoneGoogle account
Where sources liveYour disk, as Markdown you ownGoogle's servers
YouTube captureTranscript + screenshots + comments + metadataTranscript from a URL
PodcastsRSS + local Whisper + speaker labelsAudio upload
Agent / MCP accessLocal MCP server + OpenAPI bridgeNo public MCP surface
Audio OverviewsNoYes
CostFree, open source (MIT)Free tier + paid plan
PlatformWindows today, Mac queuedAny OS (browser)
TelemetryNone in the appStandard Google product data

Bottom line: pick NotebookLM for a hosted, cross-platform notebook with audio summaries and zero setup. Pick Uoink to own your sources on disk, feed them to your own AI agents over MCP, and keep everything private and local.

NotebookLM alternative FAQ

Common questions.

Is Uoink a local NotebookLM alternative?

Yes, for the video-and-research use case. Both let you ask questions grounded in sources instead of a model's guesses. The difference: NotebookLM runs in Google's cloud on your Google account; Uoink runs on your machine, saves sources to your own disk, needs no account, and is open source (MIT). Your corpus never leaves your computer unless you turn on an optional AI feature.

What does NotebookLM do that Uoink doesn't?

NotebookLM is a polished cloud app with Audio Overviews (a generated podcast-style summary), a hosted chat UI, and no install. It runs on Gemini and works on any OS in a browser. If you want a zero-install, cross-platform, cloud notebook, NotebookLM is excellent.

What does Uoink do that NotebookLM doesn't?

Uoink captures more than a YouTube URL: timestamped screenshots, top comments, channel context, and a JSON sidecar, all saved as Markdown you own. It exposes your corpus to Claude, Cursor, and Cline as MCP tools, and to any agent via an OpenAPI bridge. And it keeps everything local — no account, no cloud storage, no telemetry.

Which should I use?

Use NotebookLM if you want a hosted, cross-platform notebook with audio summaries and zero setup. Use Uoink if you want to own your sources on disk, feed them to your own AI agents over MCP, and keep everything private and local. They're not mutually exclusive — Uoink's Markdown corpora import cleanly into other tools, including NotebookLM.

Is Uoink free?

Yes, free and open source (MIT). Core capture needs no API key. Optional AI features use your own Anthropic key and are off by default. NotebookLM has a free tier with usage limits and a paid plan.

Does Uoink work on Mac?

Windows 10 and 11 today. A Mac build is queued after Windows stabilizes, using the same corpus format and MCP surface. NotebookLM, being browser-based, works on any OS now.